Competitor profile

SUNNY K M

They win 43% of what they bid, and 36% of the value they chase.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
4 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
14
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.6 Cr
of ₹7.3 Cr bid — 35.9% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 14 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count14 bids
42.9%
14.3%
42.9%
Awarded642.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected214.3%
Lost642.9%
By value₹7.3 Cr
35.9%
57.5%
Awarded₹2.6 Cr35.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.4 L6.6%
Lost₹4.2 Cr57.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹2.4 Cr90.3%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹2.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NOYAL RAJU2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹27.8 L
won head-to-head
02
ALBERT CHERIAN2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Muhammed1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹56.9 L
won head-to-head
04
Mc.Rajan1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹70.3 L
won head-to-head
05
MOHANAN.N.V0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Saju C S1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUNNY K M awardedOthers

About SUNNY K M

SUNNY K M appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 14 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹2.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 90.3% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against NOYAL RAJU, ALBERT CHERIAN and Muhammed. NOYAL RAJU bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SUNNY K M won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.