Competitor profile

NOYAL RAJU

They win 25% of what they bid, and 16% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
10 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
7 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹64.7 L
of ₹4.0 Cr bid — 16.2% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
25.0%
16.7%
58.3%
Awarded325.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected216.7%
Lost758.3%
By value₹4.0 Cr
16.2%
12.2%
71.6%
Awarded₹64.7 L16.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹48.5 L12.2%
Lost₹2.9 Cr71.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹36.8 L56.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹64.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SUNNY K M2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹50.7 L
won head-to-head
02
ALBERT CHERIAN1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹76.7 L
won head-to-head
03
Mc.Rajan2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹77.3 L
won head-to-head
04
EBIN BENNY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
va george0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
CAK CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.5 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNOYAL RAJU awardedOthers

About NOYAL RAJU

NOYAL RAJU appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹64.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 10 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 56.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SUNNY K M, ALBERT CHERIAN and Mc.Rajan. SUNNY K M bid on 7 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; NOYAL RAJU won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.