Competitor profile

SUNIL SHARMA-SHARMA ENGG. WORKS

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
4 Mar 2013last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 L
of ₹7.0 L bid — 20.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
25.0%
25.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected125.0%
Lost125.0%
By value₹7.0 L
20.5%
37.3%
42.2%
Awarded₹1.4 L20.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.6 L37.3%
Lost₹3.0 L42.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Chandigarh₹1.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NEERAJ BABBAR-SH. NEERAJ BABBAR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VIKAS GOGNA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.6 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹0
won head-to-head
05
AMIT AGGARWAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹2.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUNIL SHARMA-SHARMA awardedOthers

About SUNIL SHARMA-SHARMA ENGG. WORKS

SUNIL SHARMA-SHARMA ENGG. WORKS appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Mar 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chandigarh Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Chandigarh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NEERAJ BABBAR-SH. NEERAJ BABBAR, VIKAS GOGNA and DHARMINDER -M.S K.D SUBMERSIBLE AND ELECTRICALS. NEERAJ BABBAR-SH. NEERAJ BABBAR bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SUNIL SHARMA-SHARMA ENGG. WORKS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.