Competitor profile

SUMIT SAHEBRAO DASGUDE

They win 10% of what they bid, and 8% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
29 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹12.3 L
of ₹1.5 Cr bid — 8.1% conversion
Win rate
10.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
10.0%
50.0%
40.0%
Awarded110.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected550.0%
Lost440.0%
By value₹1.5 Cr
59.3%
32.6%
Awarded₹12.3 L8.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹90.3 L59.3%
Lost₹49.6 L32.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-PUNE₹12.3 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹12.3 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAI DEVELOPERS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Rushikesh Dnyaneshwar Dabhade1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹6.4 L
won head-to-head
03
RAHUL DHULARAM SHINGADE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S P B Pharate0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Abhayraj Ajay Sawantinamdar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
AKSHAY SUHAS PONDKULE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMIT SAHEBRAO awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SUMIT SAHEBRAO

About SUMIT SAHEBRAO DASGUDE

SUMIT SAHEBRAO DASGUDE appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 10.0% win rate — worth ₹12.3 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RDD-CEO-PUNE, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAI DEVELOPERS, Rushikesh Dnyaneshwar Dabhade and RAHUL DHULARAM SHINGADE. SAI DEVELOPERS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SUMIT SAHEBRAO DASGUDE won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.