Competitor profile

M/S SUMI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS

They win 94% of what they bid, but only 83% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

18tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
18
18 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹7.7 L
of ₹9.3 L bid — 82.5% conversion
Win rate
94.4%
of 18 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count18 bids
94.4%
Awarded1794.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost15.6%
By value₹9.3 L
82.5%
17.5%
Awarded₹7.7 L82.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.6 L17.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹3.0 L39.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹7.7 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
AMIR ENTERPRISE0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AFIFA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SANAYA ENTERPRISE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S MAA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S BABLU MANDAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S BISWAJIT CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMI CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About M/S SUMI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS

M/S SUMI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS appears as a bidder on 18 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 18 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 94.4% win rate — worth ₹7.7 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is DISTRICT MAGISTRATE MALDA, at 60.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against AMIR ENTERPRISE, AFIFA CONSTRUCTION and SANAYA ENTERPRISE. AMIR ENTERPRISE bid on 16 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S SUMI CONSTRUCTION AND SUPPLIERS won 15.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.