Competitor profile

M/S. SUMATI SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.

They win 17% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

6tenders on record
5buyer authorities
2states
13 May 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹999
of ₹30.9 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
50.0%
33.3%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected350.0%
Lost233.3%
By value₹30.9 Cr
62.3%
37.7%
Awarded₹9990.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹19.2 Cr62.3%
Lost₹11.6 Cr37.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAMARA CONSULTANTS AND DEVELOPERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
MARYSADAN PROJECTS PVT LTD2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹6.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
DEENS GROUP0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Jayakumar A0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
OMKAR ENGINEERS AND CONTRACTORS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMATI SOLUTIONS awardedOthers

About M/S. SUMATI SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD.

M/S. SUMATI SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 2 states. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹999 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panvel Municipal Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 60.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAMARA CONSULTANTS AND DEVELOPERS, MARYSADAN PROJECTS PVT LTD and DEENS GROUP. SAMARA CONSULTANTS AND DEVELOPERS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S. SUMATI SOLUTIONS PVT. LTD. won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.