Competitor profile

M/S SUMAN ENTERPRISES

They win 9% of what they bid, and 10% of the value they chase.

45tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
44
45 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
38 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.5 Cr
of ₹14.9 Cr bid — 9.9% conversion
Win rate
9.1%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count44 bids
86.4%
Awarded49.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected24.5%
Lost3886.4%
By value₹14.9 Cr
86.6%
Awarded₹1.5 Cr9.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹52.8 L3.5%
Lost₹12.9 Cr86.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

4 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S KAUTILYA GARG1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹34.2 L
won head-to-head
02
Nvimal Engineers and Contractor4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹81.2 L
won head-to-head
03
Shri Electrical Enterprises2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹31.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Ashwani Associates0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Pawan Kumar Shrama Contractor2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹55.7 L
won head-to-head
06
SANJOLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY2 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹66.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUMAN ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About M/S SUMAN ENTERPRISES

M/S SUMAN ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 45 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 9.1% win rate — worth ₹1.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 10.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S KAUTILYA GARG, Nvimal Engineers and Contractor and Shri Electrical Enterprises. M/S KAUTILYA GARG bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S SUMAN ENTERPRISES won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.