Competitor profile

M/S KAUTILYA GARG

They win 28% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

169tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
166
169 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
47
117 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹14.4 Cr
of ₹66.5 Cr bid — 21.6% conversion
Win rate
28.3%
of 166 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count166 bids
28.3%
70.5%
Awarded4728.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected21.2%
Lost11770.5%
By value₹66.5 Cr
21.6%
77.3%
Awarded₹14.4 Cr21.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹71.7 L1.1%
Lost₹51.4 Cr77.3%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

47 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Om Trading Corporation1 win · 47 shared tenders
₹34.1 L
won head-to-head
02
KALWA TRANSPORTER AND SUPPLIERS3 wins · 32 shared tenders
₹88.6 L
won head-to-head
03
Savitri Enterprises2 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹63.6 L
won head-to-head
04
Keystone Constructionare3 wins · 29 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
05
VIKAS CONSTRUCTION CO.0 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Nikhat nirman2 wins · 25 shared tenders
₹79.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedKAUTILYA GARG awardedOthers

About M/S KAUTILYA GARG

M/S KAUTILYA GARG appears as a bidder on 169 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 166 decided bids, it was awarded 47 — a 28.3% win rate — worth ₹14.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is E-IN-C BRANCH - MILITARY ENGINEER SERVICES, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 6.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Om Trading Corporation, KALWA TRANSPORTER AND SUPPLIERS and Savitri Enterprises. Om Trading Corporation bid on 47 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S KAUTILYA GARG won 19.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.