Competitor profile

SULTANA CONSTRUCTION

They win 29% of what they bid, but only 8% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

19tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
4 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
17
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.6 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 8.2% conversion
Win rate
29.4%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count17 bids
29.4%
64.7%
Awarded529.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost1164.7%
By value₹1.2 Cr
90.7%
Awarded₹9.6 L8.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 L1.2%
Lost₹1.1 Cr90.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Zilla Parishad₹9.6 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹9.6 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAHAMAN ENTERPRISE4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹6.9 L
won head-to-head
02
TAPAN KANTI GHOSH0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOTI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S. MADHURI ENTERPRISE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAHIN CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MONDAL CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSULTANA CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SULTANA CONSTRUCTION

SULTANA CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 29.4% win rate — worth ₹9.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Zilla Parishad, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAHAMAN ENTERPRISE, TAPAN KANTI GHOSH and MOTI ENTERPRISE. RAHAMAN ENTERPRISE bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SULTANA CONSTRUCTION won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.