Competitor profile

SUKHMANI TRADERS

They win 33% of what they bid — and 99% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

14tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
9 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
12
14 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹191
of ₹192 bid — 99.5% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count12 bids
33.3%
41.7%
25.0%
Awarded433.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected541.7%
Lost325.0%
By value₹192
99.5%
Awarded₹19199.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹10.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹191

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BHATTI TRANSPORT AND COMPANY1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SANDEEP KUMAR1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Madan Lal2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
GILL COMMISSION AGENT1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹27
won head-to-head
05
M/s.BHATTI TRADES2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹10
won head-to-head
06
MANDEEP SINGH GILL1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUKHMANI TRADERS awardedOthers

About SUKHMANI TRADERS

SUKHMANI TRADERS appears as a bidder on 14 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹191 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Information and Public Relations, at 89.5% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against BHATTI TRANSPORT AND COMPANY, SANDEEP KUMAR and Madan Lal. BHATTI TRANSPORT AND COMPANY bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SUKHMANI TRADERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.