Competitor profile

SUJAN KUMAR MISTRI

They win 43% of what they bid — and 53% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

7tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
28 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.2 Cr
of ₹2.3 Cr bid — 53.2% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count7 bids
42.9%
57.1%
Awarded342.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost457.1%
By value₹2.3 Cr
53.2%
46.8%
Awarded₹1.2 Cr53.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.1 Cr46.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PHE₹16.3 L13.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
West Bengal₹1.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KAMRULA CONSTRUCTION CO1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
02
K S ENTERPRISE1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹9.8 L
won head-to-head
03
SAP ENTERPRISE0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
BISWAS ENTERPRISE1 win · 1 shared tender
₹38.4 L
won head-to-head
05
ROY AND SONS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹48.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUJAN KUMAR awardedOthers

About SUJAN KUMAR MISTRI

SUJAN KUMAR MISTRI appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹1.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 28 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is KOLKATA METROPOLITAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY, at 86.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from West Bengal. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KAMRULA CONSTRUCTION CO, K S ENTERPRISE and SAP ENTERPRISE. KAMRULA CONSTRUCTION CO bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; SUJAN KUMAR MISTRI won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.