Competitor profile

sujal Associates

They win 33% of what they bid — and 62% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
2 Jun 2026last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.8 L
of ₹81.4 L bid — 62.5% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹81.4 L
62.5%
37.5%
Awarded₹50.8 L62.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹30.5 L37.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

MP Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd₹50.8 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹50.8 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BAGAAJ MAA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.6 L
won head-to-head
02
PRACHI ELECTRICAL0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN1 win · 1 shared tender
₹24.4 L
won head-to-head
04
RATAN SINGH CONTRACTOR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Avinash Chopra0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsujal Associates awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to sujal Associates

About sujal Associates

sujal Associates appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹50.8 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jun 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BAGAAJ MAA CONSTRUCTION, PRACHI ELECTRICAL and NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN. BAGAAJ MAA CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; sujal Associates won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.