Competitor profile

NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

They win 38% of what they bid, and 39% of the value they chase.

56tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
56
56 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
21
35 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.8 Cr
of ₹4.5 Cr bid — 39.1% conversion
Win rate
37.5%
of 56 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count56 bids
37.5%
62.5%
Awarded2137.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost3562.5%
By value₹4.5 Cr
39.1%
60.9%
Awarded₹1.8 Cr39.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.7 Cr60.9%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHREE SATYAM PROJECTS4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹20.9 L
won head-to-head
02
SHREE ASSOCIATES1 win · 7 shared tenders
₹1.2 L
won head-to-head
03
HARI SHARAN MISHRA1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹63,678
won head-to-head
04
RAJ NARAYAN MISHRA3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹8.7 L
won head-to-head
05
VOCATION PROJECTS INDIA PRIVATE LIMITED2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹13.2 L
won head-to-head
06
DAVIDSONS ELECTRICAL AND CIVIL1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹7.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNEERAJ KUMAR awardedOthers

About NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN

NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN appears as a bidder on 56 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 56 decided bids, it was awarded 21 — a 37.5% win rate — worth ₹1.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MP Police Housing and Infrastructure Development Corporation Ltd, at 66.0% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 3.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHREE SATYAM PROJECTS, SHREE ASSOCIATES and HARI SHARAN MISHRA. SHREE SATYAM PROJECTS bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; NEERAJ KUMAR JAIN won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.