Competitor profile

SUDHA AGENCY

They win 20% of what they bid, and 29% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.0 Cr
of ₹7.1 Cr bid — 28.6% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
20.0%
80.0%
Awarded220.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost880.0%
By value₹7.1 Cr
28.6%
71.4%
Awarded₹2.0 Cr28.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.1 Cr71.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

2 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹1.6 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S BABLU MEAT AND CHICKEN SHOP1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹46.0 L
won head-to-head
03
MAHENDRA SINGH1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹80.7 L
won head-to-head
04
RUPA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAI AGENCY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHREE GANPATI TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUDHA AGENCY awardedOthers

About SUDHA AGENCY

SUDHA AGENCY appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹2.0 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Institute of Psychiatry, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA, M/S BABLU MEAT AND CHICKEN SHOP and MAHENDRA SINGH. M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SUDHA AGENCY won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.