Competitor profile

M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA

They win 30% of what they bid, and 23% of the value they chase.

10tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
1 Jul 2025last award
Total bids
10
10 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹6.8 Cr bid — 22.9% conversion
Win rate
30.0%
of 10 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count10 bids
30.0%
20.0%
50.0%
Awarded330.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected220.0%
Lost550.0%
By value₹6.8 Cr
22.9%
20.0%
57.0%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr22.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 Cr20.0%
Lost₹3.9 Cr57.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S BABLU MEAT AND CHICKEN SHOP1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹46.0 L
won head-to-head
02
MAHENDRA SINGH1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹80.7 L
won head-to-head
03
SUDHA AGENCY2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹2.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
RUPA ENTERPRISES0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
SAI AGENCY0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SHREE GANPATI TRADERS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedNAND KISHORE awardedOthers

About M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA

M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA appears as a bidder on 10 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 10 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 30.0% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Jul 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Central Institute of Psychiatry, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S BABLU MEAT AND CHICKEN SHOP, MAHENDRA SINGH and SUDHA AGENCY. M/S BABLU MEAT AND CHICKEN SHOP bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S NAND KISHORE FOGLA won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.