Competitor profile

SUBRAT KUMAR SAHU

They win 2% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

220tenders on record
9buyer authorities
1state
21 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
219
220 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
209 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.6 Cr
of ₹93.1 Cr bid — 1.8% conversion
Win rate
2.3%
of 219 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count219 bids
95.4%
Awarded52.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected52.3%
Lost20995.4%
By value₹93.1 Cr
95.8%
Awarded₹1.6 Cr1.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr2.5%
Lost₹89.2 Cr95.8%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE RW I₹1.2 Cr73.9%
EIC-CIVIL₹21.4 L13.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Odisha₹1.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
NIHAR RANJAN PANDIA3 wins · 123 shared tenders
₹99.2 L
won head-to-head
02
SANJIB KUMAR HOTA2 wins · 120 shared tenders
₹80.0 L
won head-to-head
03
Mahesh Kumar Agrawal2 wins · 119 shared tenders
₹1.0 Cr
won head-to-head
04
MANAS RANJAN THAKUR3 wins · 107 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
05
KL INFRAPROJECTS0 wins · 101 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
HARAPRASAD SAHU1 win · 100 shared tenders
₹29.3 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSUBRAT KUMAR awardedOthers

About SUBRAT KUMAR SAHU

SUBRAT KUMAR SAHU appears as a bidder on 220 government tenders on record, from 9 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 219 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 2.3% win rate — worth ₹1.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 21 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE RW I, at 73.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Odisha. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against NIHAR RANJAN PANDIA, SANJIB KUMAR HOTA and Mahesh Kumar Agrawal. NIHAR RANJAN PANDIA bid on 123 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SUBRAT KUMAR SAHU won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.