Competitor profile

SRIPALI Construction

They win 50% of what they bid, and 58% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
22 Mar 2024last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.4 Cr
of ₹2.4 Cr bid — 58.5% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.4 Cr
58.5%
41.5%
Awarded₹1.4 Cr58.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹100.0 L41.5%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹1.4 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
MS Satyam Enterprise0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
kabuj mahmud laskar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S MAA DURGA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹95.0 L
won head-to-head
04
Sanjay Kr. Patoa0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Aktar Hussain Laskar0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S MIDAS GRANITES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSRIPALI Construction awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SRIPALI Construction

About SRIPALI Construction

SRIPALI Construction appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹1.4 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 22 Mar 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Building and NH Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against MS Satyam Enterprise, kabuj mahmud laskar and M/S MAA DURGA CONSTRUCTION. MS Satyam Enterprise bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; SRIPALI Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.