Competitor profile

SMITA KUMARI

They win 50% of what they bid — and 74% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

6tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
17 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹39.1 L
of ₹52.7 L bid — 74.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count6 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded350.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost350.0%
By value₹52.7 L
74.1%
25.9%
Awarded₹39.1 L74.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹13.6 L25.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Amit Construction0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
GIRISH CHANDRA MOHANTY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NARESH PADHAN1 win · 1 shared tender
₹5.1 L
won head-to-head
04
SANJAY KUMAR0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VIDVATAM0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
GAYATRI SINGH1 win · 1 shared tender
₹4.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSMITA KUMARI awardedOthers

About SMITA KUMARI

SMITA KUMARI appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹39.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Amit Construction, GIRISH CHANDRA MOHANTY and NARESH PADHAN. Amit Construction bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SMITA KUMARI won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.