Competitor profile

Amit Construction

They win 11% of what they bid, and 2% of the value they chase.

27tenders on record
3buyer authorities
0states
31 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
27
27 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹16.6 L
of ₹8.0 Cr bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
11.1%
of 27 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count27 bids
11.1%
18.5%
70.4%
Awarded311.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected518.5%
Lost1970.4%
By value₹8.0 Cr
28.6%
69.3%
Awarded₹16.6 L2.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.3 Cr28.6%
Lost₹5.5 Cr69.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

3 awards on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Bhawani Sankar Dhar1 win · 8 shared tenders
₹30.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Prakash Padhee2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
GOVIND AGRAWAL0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
JAI MAA RAMCHANDI ENTERPRISES1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹23.8 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S PRATIK CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
sanjay kumar goenka0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAmit Construction awardedOthers

About Amit Construction

Amit Construction appears as a bidder on 27 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities on central and PSU portals. Of its 27 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 11.1% win rate — worth ₹16.6 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Mahanadi Coalfields Limited, at 96.9% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. On priced bids, its median quote is 4.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Bhawani Sankar Dhar, Prakash Padhee and GOVIND AGRAWAL. Bhawani Sankar Dhar bid on 8 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Amit Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.