Competitor profile

M/S SITARAM JI CONSTRUCTION

They win 25% of what they bid, and 25% of the value they chase.

4tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
29 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹97.0 L
of ₹3.9 Cr bid — 25.1% conversion
Win rate
25.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
25.0%
75.0%
Awarded125.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost375.0%
By value₹3.9 Cr
25.1%
74.9%
Awarded₹97.0 L25.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.9 Cr74.9%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹97.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VINOD KUMAR SONKAR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S Tathastu0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NYSHA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TIWARI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹1.9 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S ALFAROOQUE CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹49.2 L
won head-to-head
06
M/S MAMTA TRADERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSITARAM JI awardedOthers

About M/S SITARAM JI CONSTRUCTION

M/S SITARAM JI CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 25.0% win rate — worth ₹97.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 29 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is UP Police Awas Nigam Limited, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VINOD KUMAR SONKAR, M/S Tathastu and NYSHA CONSTRUCTION. VINOD KUMAR SONKAR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/S SITARAM JI CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.