Competitor profile

SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS

They win 20% of what they bid — and 31% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

15tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹15.2 Cr
of ₹48.4 Cr bid — 31.4% conversion
Win rate
20.0%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
20.0%
73.3%
Awarded320.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected16.7%
Lost1173.3%
By value₹48.4 Cr
31.4%
61.0%
Awarded₹15.2 Cr31.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.7 Cr7.6%
Lost₹29.5 Cr61.0%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹15.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
ATUL KHARE3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹34.1 L
won head-to-head
02
ms shiva associates0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
ms manish construction co.1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹2.8 Cr
won head-to-head
04
M/S S AMOLAK CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹2.6 Cr
won head-to-head
05
SAMAY ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
RCC DEVELOPERS PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS awardedOthers

About SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS

SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 20.0% win rate — worth ₹15.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Madhya Pradesh Road Development Corporation Limited, at 54.4% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 8.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against ATUL KHARE, ms shiva associates and ms manish construction co.. ATUL KHARE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.