Competitor profile

ATUL KHARE

They win 76% of what they bid, and 67% of the value they chase.

45tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
3 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
45
45 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
34
8 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹23.2 Cr
of ₹34.5 Cr bid — 67.4% conversion
Win rate
75.6%
of 45 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count45 bids
75.6%
17.8%
Awarded3475.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected36.7%
Lost817.8%
By value₹34.5 Cr
67.4%
20.1%
12.5%
Awarded₹23.2 Cr67.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹6.9 Cr20.1%
Lost₹4.3 Cr12.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD- Roads and Bridges₹22.6 Cr97.2%

Operating states

LowHigh
Madhya Pradesh₹23.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
ms shiva associates0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S S AMOLAK CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
m/s Achhelal Mahobiya0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
H P Construction Company0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
VP CHANDRA CONSTRUCTION PRIVATE LIMITED0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedATUL KHARE awardedOthers

About ATUL KHARE

ATUL KHARE appears as a bidder on 45 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 45 decided bids, it was awarded 34 — a 75.6% win rate — worth ₹23.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD- Roads and Bridges, at 97.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Madhya Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS, ms shiva associates and M/S S AMOLAK CONSTRUCTION PVT. LTD.. SHYAM CONSTRUCTIONS bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; ATUL KHARE won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.