Competitor profile

shubham satish gadhave

They win 31% of what they bid, and 27% of the value they chase.

56tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
54
56 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
17
18 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.9 Cr
of ₹6.9 Cr bid — 27.4% conversion
Win rate
31.5%
of 54 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count54 bids
31.5%
35.2%
33.3%
Awarded1731.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected1935.2%
Lost1833.3%
By value₹6.9 Cr
27.4%
52.1%
20.5%
Awarded₹1.9 Cr27.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.6 Cr52.1%
Lost₹1.4 Cr20.5%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.9 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SANDIP PANDURANG HIPPARKAR1 win · 20 shared tenders
₹12.6 L
won head-to-head
02
NIKHIL SHIRISH MARNE1 win · 17 shared tenders
₹11.6 L
won head-to-head
03
SAI LAXMAN CONSTRUCTION1 win · 13 shared tenders
₹21.2 L
won head-to-head
04
SHANKAR PANDURANG BAJBALKAR0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Mallikarjun Basappa Talikoti0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
SAGAR CONSTRUCTION1 win · 6 shared tenders
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedshubham satish awardedOthers

About shubham satish gadhave

shubham satish gadhave appears as a bidder on 56 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 54 decided bids, it was awarded 17 — a 31.5% win rate — worth ₹1.9 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region-Pune, at 86.4% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SANDIP PANDURANG HIPPARKAR, NIKHIL SHIRISH MARNE and SAI LAXMAN CONSTRUCTION. SANDIP PANDURANG HIPPARKAR bid on 20 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; shubham satish gadhave won 12.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.