Competitor profile

SHUBHAM ENTERPRISES

They win 17% of what they bid, and 12% of the value they chase.

55tenders on record
9buyer authorities
1state
1 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
54
55 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
9
37 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹8.5 Cr bid — 12.5% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 54 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count54 bids
16.7%
14.8%
68.5%
Awarded916.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected814.8%
Lost3768.5%
By value₹8.5 Cr
12.5%
46.3%
41.2%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr12.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹3.9 Cr46.3%
Lost₹3.5 Cr41.2%

Where they win

4 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RDD-CEO-PUNE₹27.4 L25.8%
RDD-CEO-NASHIK₹90,6970.9%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
KANIFNATH ENTERPRISES14 wins · 23 shared tenders
₹96.2 L
won head-to-head
02
ADMS Solutions0 wins · 20 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
NATH KRUPA ENTERPRISES1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
04
SOHAM ELECTRICAL AND CONTRACTOR9 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹2.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
ENERGEX SOLUTIONS PRIVATE LIMITED7 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹25.0 L
won head-to-head
06
NAADBRAMHA ELECTRICALS0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHUBHAM ENTERPRISES awardedOthers

About SHUBHAM ENTERPRISES

SHUBHAM ENTERPRISES appears as a bidder on 55 government tenders on record, from 9 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 54 decided bids, it was awarded 9 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 1 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panvel Municipal Corporation, at 42.6% of what it has won, out of 4 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against KANIFNATH ENTERPRISES, ADMS Solutions and NATH KRUPA ENTERPRISES. KANIFNATH ENTERPRISES bid on 23 of the same tenders and won 14 of them; SHUBHAM ENTERPRISES won 5.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.