Competitor profile

SHRIMO CONSTRUCTION

They win 14% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

73tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
7 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
70
73 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
10
54 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹6.6 Cr
of ₹45.0 Cr bid — 14.6% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 70 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count70 bids
14.3%
77.1%
Awarded1014.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected68.6%
Lost5477.1%
By value₹45.0 Cr
14.6%
23.1%
62.3%
Awarded₹6.6 Cr14.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.4 Cr23.1%
Lost₹28.0 Cr62.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹6.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Atha Taj Khan4 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹1.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
HITESH CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
JITENDRA FOUJLAL MANE1 win · 11 shared tenders
₹27.2 L
won head-to-head
04
VISHWADEEP ENTERPRISES0 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S R.P.Potpose0 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANIKET DNYANESHWAR MANKAR0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRIMO CONSTRUCTION awardedOthers

About SHRIMO CONSTRUCTION

SHRIMO CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 73 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 70 decided bids, it was awarded 10 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹6.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 7 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 82.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Atha Taj Khan, HITESH CONSTRUCTION and JITENDRA FOUJLAL MANE. Atha Taj Khan bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SHRIMO CONSTRUCTION won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.