Competitor profile

Shri Sajal Kabra

They win 17% of what they bid, and 17% of the value they chase.

6tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
6 Apr 2026last award
Total bids
6
6 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹6.2 Cr bid — 17.1% conversion
Win rate
16.7%
of 6 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count6 bids
16.7%
16.7%
66.7%
Awarded116.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected116.7%
Lost466.7%
By value₹6.2 Cr
17.0%
10.2%
72.7%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr17.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹63.7 L10.2%
Lost₹4.5 Cr72.7%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹1.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VAIBHAV PREMSING RAJPUT1 win · 5 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Nayan Yashavant Bhosale3 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹3.3 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S LIMRA INFRAPROJECTS AURANGABAD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MAHALAXMI INFRA0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
MANGALSING RAMESH CHAVAN0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
M/S. GANRAJ CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShri Sajal awardedOthers

About Shri Sajal Kabra

Shri Sajal Kabra appears as a bidder on 6 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 6 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 16.7% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 6 Apr 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.8% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VAIBHAV PREMSING RAJPUT, Nayan Yashavant Bhosale and M/S LIMRA INFRAPROJECTS AURANGABAD. VAIBHAV PREMSING RAJPUT bid on 5 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; Shri Sajal Kabra won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.