Competitor profile

SHRI RAMPRASAD RATANLAL MANE

They win 40% of what they bid, and 35% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
5 Dec 2025last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹13.0 L
of ₹37.0 L bid — 35.2% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹37.0 L
35.2%
64.8%
Awarded₹13.0 L35.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹24.0 L64.8%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹13.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
VINOD MOHAN MADAVI0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
Afroz Khan Shafi Khan2 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹16.6 L
won head-to-head
03
M/S INDU CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S YESH ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
RAJESH RANGARI0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Dashrath Chowaram Dhankar0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRI RAMPRASAD awardedOthers

About SHRI RAMPRASAD RATANLAL MANE

SHRI RAMPRASAD RATANLAL MANE appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹13.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Dec 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Nagpur Municipal Corporation Nagpur, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.7% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against VINOD MOHAN MADAVI, Afroz Khan Shafi Khan and M/S INDU CONSTRUCTION. VINOD MOHAN MADAVI bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SHRI RAMPRASAD RATANLAL MANE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.