Competitor profile

SHRI RAM INFRASTRUCTURE

They win 63% of what they bid, but only 21% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

8tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
17 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
8
8 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 Cr
of ₹5.2 Cr bid — 20.9% conversion
Win rate
62.5%
of 8 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count8 bids
62.5%
37.5%
Awarded562.5%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost337.5%
By value₹5.2 Cr
20.9%
79.1%
Awarded₹1.1 Cr20.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹4.1 Cr79.1%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹1.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S SATYAM ASSOCIATES3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹4.1 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/S NISHAKANTGUPTA0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S. R.R. Enterprises0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S GOVIND BALLABH GAUTAM0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
M/S I.J.TILES INDUSTRIES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
DLG ENTERPRISES PVT LTD0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRI RAM INFRASTRUCTURE awardedOthers

About SHRI RAM INFRASTRUCTURE

SHRI RAM INFRASTRUCTURE appears as a bidder on 8 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 8 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 62.5% win rate — worth ₹1.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 17 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Kanpur Municipal Corporation, Kanpur, UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/S SATYAM ASSOCIATES, M/S NISHAKANTGUPTA and M/S. R.R. Enterprises. M/S SATYAM ASSOCIATES bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; SHRI RAM INFRASTRUCTURE won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.