Competitor profile

SHRI MAHADEV COMPANY

They win 71% of what they bid — and 99.8% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

17tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
2 Jul 2026last award
Total bids
17
17 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
12
4 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹1.1 L
of ₹1.1 L bid — 99.8% conversion
Win rate
70.6%
of 17 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count17 bids
70.6%
23.5%
Awarded1270.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.9%
Lost423.5%
By value₹1.1 L
99.8%
Awarded₹1.1 L99.8%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹10.0%
Lost₹1740.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹1.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Nitya Plastic Udyog9 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹79,965
won head-to-head
02
goyal e solutions4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹1.3 L
won head-to-head
03
Shri Nangla Padi Plastic4 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹4
won head-to-head
04
HARISH CHANDER3 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹8
won head-to-head
05
Tirupati Enterprises4 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹2.3 L
won head-to-head
06
S T ENTERPRISES3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹2.0 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRI MAHADEV awardedOthers

About SHRI MAHADEV COMPANY

SHRI MAHADEV COMPANY appears as a bidder on 17 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 17 decided bids, it was awarded 12 — a 70.6% win rate — worth ₹1.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 2 Jul 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Cooperation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Nitya Plastic Udyog, goyal e solutions and Shri Nangla Padi Plastic. Nitya Plastic Udyog bid on 11 of the same tenders and won 9 of them; SHRI MAHADEV COMPANY won 7.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.