Competitor profile

SHRI AMOL SHIVGONDA PATIL

They win 27% of what they bid, and 19% of the value they chase.

15tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
19 May 2026last award
Total bids
15
15 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
4
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹58.0 L
of ₹3.1 Cr bid — 18.6% conversion
Win rate
26.7%
of 15 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count15 bids
26.7%
73.3%
Awarded426.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1173.3%
By value₹3.1 Cr
18.6%
81.4%
Awarded₹58.0 L18.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.5 Cr81.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹58.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
RAJARAM TIMMA HASURE6 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹94.0 L
won head-to-head
02
Shri Premkumar Rajaram Hasure5 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
wasim pathan0 wins · 14 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
SHRI GAURAV UDAY PATIL0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
KARNA MORE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHRI AMOL SHIVGONDA awardedOthers

About SHRI AMOL SHIVGONDA PATIL

SHRI AMOL SHIVGONDA PATIL appears as a bidder on 15 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 15 decided bids, it was awarded 4 — a 26.7% win rate — worth ₹58.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 19 May 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against RAJARAM TIMMA HASURE, Shri Premkumar Rajaram Hasure and wasim pathan. RAJARAM TIMMA HASURE bid on 15 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; SHRI AMOL SHIVGONDA PATIL won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.