Competitor profile

Shivshambhu Majoor Kamgar Sanstha

They win 33% of what they bid, and 33% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
9 Apr 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.4 L
of ₹28.7 L bid — 32.6% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost266.7%
By value₹28.7 L
32.6%
67.4%
Awarded₹9.4 L32.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹19.3 L67.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹9.4 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
02
Balaji MKS0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Kisandeo MKS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
swa vasantrao naik MKSS Mohegaon0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹18.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShivshambhu awardedOthers

About Shivshambhu Majoor Kamgar Sanstha

Shivshambhu Majoor Kamgar Sanstha appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹9.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 9 Apr 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE Small Scale Irrigation (WC) Pune, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 2.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Vidhyut And Yantriki Bandhkam Majoor Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit, Balaji MKS and Kisandeo MKS. Mahatma Jyotiba Fule Vidhyut And Yantriki Bandhkam Majoor Kamgar Sahakari Sanstha Maryadit bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Shivshambhu Majoor Kamgar Sanstha won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.