Competitor profile

Shivraj Banola

They win 43% of what they bid, and 48% of the value they chase.

43tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
20 Mar 2026last award
Total bids
42
43 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
18
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹74.2 Cr
of ₹154.0 Cr bid — 48.2% conversion
Win rate
42.9%
of 42 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count42 bids
42.9%
11.9%
45.2%
Awarded1842.9%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected511.9%
Lost1945.2%
By value₹154.0 Cr
48.2%
20.6%
31.3%
Awarded₹74.2 Cr48.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹31.7 Cr20.6%
Lost₹48.2 Cr31.3%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹74.2 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd.3 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹18.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Trilok Rawat3 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹18.7 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Shri Guru Agencies1 win · 10 shared tenders
₹45.9 L
won head-to-head
04
GIRISH BHAGAT0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Gopal Singh Chauhan6 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹13.4 Cr
won head-to-head
06
R K ENGINEERS SALES LTD0 wins · 5 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedShivraj Banola awardedOthers

About Shivraj Banola

Shivraj Banola appears as a bidder on 43 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 42 decided bids, it was awarded 18 — a 42.9% win rate — worth ₹74.2 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 20 Mar 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 97.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.1% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Trilok Rawat and Shri Guru Agencies. M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd. bid on 19 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Shivraj Banola won 10.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.