Competitor profile

M/s Trilok Rawat

They win 56% of what they bid, and 47% of the value they chase.

284tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
31 Jan 2026last award
Total bids
282
284 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
159
93 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹558.5 Cr
of ₹1.2K Cr bid — 47.2% conversion
Win rate
56.4%
of 282 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count282 bids
56.4%
10.6%
33.0%
Awarded15956.4%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected3010.6%
Lost9333.0%
By value₹1.2K Cr
47.2%
14.4%
38.4%
Awarded₹558.5 Cr47.2%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹170.6 Cr14.4%
Lost₹453.7 Cr38.4%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttarakhand₹558.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd.20 wins · 52 shared tenders
₹168.7 Cr
won head-to-head
02
M/s Mohd. Anis8 wins · 26 shared tenders
₹47.5 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Shri Guru Agencies4 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹31.4 Cr
won head-to-head
04
cs.negi7 wins · 19 shared tenders
₹8.7 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S BUDDHA CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹3.5 Cr
won head-to-head
06
SHIVRAJ BANAULA2 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹32.2 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedTrilok Rawat awardedOthers

About M/s Trilok Rawat

M/s Trilok Rawat appears as a bidder on 284 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 282 decided bids, it was awarded 159 — a 56.4% win rate — worth ₹558.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 31 Jan 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is MD (Drinking Water) Peyjal Nigam GoUK, at 86.0% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Uttarakhand. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd., M/s Mohd. Anis and Shri Guru Agencies. M/s Kashmirilal Constructions Pvt. Ltd. bid on 52 of the same tenders and won 20 of them; M/s Trilok Rawat won 17.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.