Competitor profile

M/S SHIV GAUTAM TRADERS

They win 33% of what they bid, and 43% of the value they chase.

3tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
26 Jun 2025last award
Total bids
3
3 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹50.0 L
of ₹1.2 Cr bid — 42.9% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 3 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count3 bids
33.3%
33.3%
33.3%
Awarded133.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected133.3%
Lost133.3%
By value₹1.2 Cr
42.9%
53.0%
Awarded₹50.0 L42.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹4.7 L4.0%
Lost₹61.8 L53.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹50.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BRAHMI CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹59.9 L
won head-to-head
02
RAJ RAJESHWARI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
K.S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
MAA ASHAPURA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 1 shared tender
₹47.0 L
won head-to-head
05
PRAVEEN KUMAR VARDAJI0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Annapurna Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHIV GAUTAM awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to SHIV GAUTAM

About M/S SHIV GAUTAM TRADERS

M/S SHIV GAUTAM TRADERS appears as a bidder on 3 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 3 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹50.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 26 Jun 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Panchayati Raj Department, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BRAHMI CONSTRUCTION, RAJ RAJESHWARI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY and K.S CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. BRAHMI CONSTRUCTION bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/S SHIV GAUTAM TRADERS won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.