Competitor profile

SHIJU M.T

They win 32% of what they bid, and 32% of the value they chase.

76tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
76
76 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
24
51 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹71.0 L
of ₹2.2 Cr bid — 32.4% conversion
Win rate
31.6%
of 76 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count76 bids
31.6%
67.1%
Awarded2431.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.3%
Lost5167.1%
By value₹2.2 Cr
32.4%
67.0%
Awarded₹71.0 L32.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.4 L0.6%
Lost₹1.5 Cr67.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹67.3 L94.8%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹71.0 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Johnson AV6 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹13.5 L
won head-to-head
02
BASTIN VINCENT7 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹7.4 L
won head-to-head
03
PAULY V J5 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹8.0 L
won head-to-head
04
SHARJAS A4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹12.7 L
won head-to-head
05
SANKARANKUTTY.K7 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹21.3 L
won head-to-head
06
BINSON JOSEPH5 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹21.9 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHIJU M.T awardedOthers

About SHIJU M.T

SHIJU M.T appears as a bidder on 76 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 76 decided bids, it was awarded 24 — a 31.6% win rate — worth ₹71.0 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 94.8% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Johnson AV, BASTIN VINCENT and PAULY V J. Johnson AV bid on 17 of the same tenders and won 6 of them; SHIJU M.T won 4.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.