Competitor profile

Johnson AV

They win 42% of what they bid, and 34% of the value they chase.

57tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
57
57 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
24
32 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹69.1 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 34.3% conversion
Win rate
42.1%
of 57 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count57 bids
42.1%
56.1%
Awarded2442.1%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected11.8%
Lost3256.1%
By value₹2.0 Cr
34.3%
65.1%
Awarded₹69.1 L34.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹1.3 L0.6%
Lost₹1.3 Cr65.1%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹58.8 L85.1%

Operating states

LowHigh
Kerala₹69.1 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIJU M.T4 wins · 17 shared tenders
₹12.7 L
won head-to-head
02
SHARJAS A2 wins · 16 shared tenders
₹5.3 L
won head-to-head
03
KIRAN MG2 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹10.0 L
won head-to-head
04
T AND C ELECTRICS3 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹12.1 L
won head-to-head
05
PAULY V J4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹12.4 L
won head-to-head
06
BIJU JOSE4 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹13.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedJohnson AV awardedOthers

About Johnson AV

Johnson AV appears as a bidder on 57 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 57 decided bids, it was awarded 24 — a 42.1% win rate — worth ₹69.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 85.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Kerala. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIJU M.T, SHARJAS A and KIRAN MG. SHIJU M.T bid on 17 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Johnson AV won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.