Competitor profile

M/s SHAMBHAVI DEVELOPERS

They win 14% of what they bid, but only 1% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

7tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
23 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
7
7 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
5 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹8.1 L
of ₹14.3 Cr bid — 0.6% conversion
Win rate
14.3%
of 7 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count7 bids
14.3%
14.3%
71.4%
Awarded114.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected114.3%
Lost571.4%
By value₹14.3 Cr
81.2%
18.2%
Awarded₹8.1 L0.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹11.6 Cr81.2%
Lost₹2.6 Cr18.2%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s VIJENDRA PRATAP SINGH0 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/S NANKU SINGH3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹1.1 Cr
won head-to-head
03
M/S M.V.D. INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
M/S ATUL KUMAR TIWARI1 win · 1 shared tender
₹11.3 L
won head-to-head
05
M/S CHANDRAMOHAN UPADHYAY0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHAMBHAVI DEVELOPERS awardedOthers

About M/s SHAMBHAVI DEVELOPERS

M/s SHAMBHAVI DEVELOPERS appears as a bidder on 7 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 7 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 14.3% win rate — worth ₹8.1 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 23 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Chief Engineer Gorakhpur Zone PWD Gorakhpur UP, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/s VIJENDRA PRATAP SINGH, M/S NANKU SINGH and M/S M.V.D. INFRADEVELOPERS PVT. LTD.. M/s VIJENDRA PRATAP SINGH bid on 6 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s SHAMBHAVI DEVELOPERS won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.