Competitor profile

SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION

They win 21% of what they bid, and 11% of the value they chase.

24tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
24
24 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
5
19 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹72.5 L
of ₹6.3 Cr bid — 11.4% conversion
Win rate
20.8%
of 24 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count24 bids
20.8%
79.2%
Awarded520.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost1979.2%
By value₹6.3 Cr
11.4%
88.6%
Awarded₹72.5 L11.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹5.6 Cr88.6%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹55.5 L76.6%
HAUDD₹17.0 L23.4%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Ab Majid Sheikh-Aftab Construction4 wins · 12 shared tenders
₹1.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
MOHD. SHAFI MIR-MJ ROAD CONSTRUCTIONS6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.5 Cr
won head-to-head
04
₹87.3 L
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSHABIR AHMAD awardedOthers

About SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION

SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION appears as a bidder on 24 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 24 decided bids, it was awarded 5 — a 20.8% win rate — worth ₹72.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 76.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 5.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against Ab Majid Sheikh-Aftab Construction, Abdul Qayoom Bhat-Azad Road Constructions and MOHD. SHAFI MIR-MJ ROAD CONSTRUCTIONS. Ab Majid Sheikh-Aftab Construction bid on 12 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.