Competitor profile

Abdul Qayoom Bhat-Azad Road Constructions

They win 8% of what they bid, and 15% of the value they chase.

13tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
30 Sept 2013last award
Total bids
13
13 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹81.4 L
of ₹5.6 Cr bid — 14.6% conversion
Win rate
7.7%
of 13 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count13 bids
46.2%
46.2%
Awarded17.7%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected646.2%
Lost646.2%
By value₹5.6 Cr
14.6%
15.8%
69.6%
Awarded₹81.4 L14.6%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹88.1 L15.8%
Lost₹3.9 Cr69.6%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

PWD₹81.4 L100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹42.8 L
won head-to-head
02
Ab Majid Sheikh-Aftab Construction2 wins · 6 shared tenders
₹58.7 L
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹58.6 L
won head-to-head
05
firoz mir-Valley Road Construction Co0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
MOHD. SHAFI MIR-MJ ROAD CONSTRUCTIONS2 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹95.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedAbdul Qayoom awardedOthers

About Abdul Qayoom Bhat-Azad Road Constructions

Abdul Qayoom Bhat-Azad Road Constructions appears as a bidder on 13 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 13 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 7.7% win rate — worth ₹81.4 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 30 Sept 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is PWD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Jammu And Kashmir. On priced bids, its median quote is 7.5% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION, Ab Majid Sheikh-Aftab Construction and BILAL AHMAD MIR -M/s S.L. Road Construction. SHABIR AHMAD RATHER-M/S SIR ROAD CONSTRUCTION bid on 10 of the same tenders and won 3 of them; Abdul Qayoom Bhat-Azad Road Constructions won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.