Competitor profile

Sh. Pawan Kumar, Contr

They win 65% of what they bid, but only 38% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

117tenders on record
1buyer authority
1state
5 Oct 2026last award
Total bids
117
117 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
76
39 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.1 Cr
of ₹5.5 Cr bid — 38.3% conversion
Win rate
65.0%
of 117 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count117 bids
65.0%
33.3%
Awarded7665.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected21.7%
Lost3933.3%
By value₹5.5 Cr
38.3%
55.4%
Awarded₹2.1 Cr38.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹34.4 L6.2%
Lost₹3.1 Cr55.4%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Haryana₹2.1 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/s SHiv Yadav Constructions0 wins · 39 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
M/s R.P. Brothers1 win · 28 shared tenders
₹1.5 L
won head-to-head
03
Sh. Vinod Kumar Tihal7 wins · 22 shared tenders
₹11.1 L
won head-to-head
04
CHAUHAN CONSTRUCTION & DEVELOPERS3 wins · 15 shared tenders
₹14.5 L
won head-to-head
05
Sh. Dubeshwar Pandit, Contr4 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹54.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Sh. Sunil Kumar4 wins · 8 shared tenders
₹22.4 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSh. Pawan Kumar, awardedOthers

About Sh. Pawan Kumar, Contr

Sh. Pawan Kumar, Contr appears as a bidder on 117 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority in 1 state. Of its 117 decided bids, it was awarded 76 — a 65.0% win rate — worth ₹2.1 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 5 Oct 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Haryana Board Corporation, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Haryana. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against M/s SHiv Yadav Constructions, M/s R.P. Brothers and Sh. Vinod Kumar Tihal. M/s SHiv Yadav Constructions bid on 39 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Sh. Pawan Kumar, Contr won 28.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.