Competitor profile

Sh. Chaturbhuj Gupta-M/s Chaturbhuj Gupta

They win 50% of what they bid — and 69% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

2tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
12 Dec 2013last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹5.6 Cr
of ₹8.1 Cr bid — 69.4% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹8.1 Cr
69.4%
30.6%
Awarded₹5.6 Cr69.4%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.5 Cr30.6%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

RSWC - CMD₹5.6 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Rajasthan₹5.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
₹0
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
kana ram lohar-K G Construction0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Vishnu Kumar-M/s R.P.Goyal0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
₹2.5 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSh. Chaturbhuj awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to Sh. Chaturbhuj

About Sh. Chaturbhuj Gupta-M/s Chaturbhuj Gupta

Sh. Chaturbhuj Gupta-M/s Chaturbhuj Gupta appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹5.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 12 Dec 2013.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is RSWC - CMD, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Rajasthan.

It most often bids against M/S Rajendra Singh Gill-M/S Rajendra Singh Gill, BHUSHAN LAL SHARMA-M/S AROMA INDUSTRIES LIMITED and kana ram lohar-K G Construction. M/S Rajendra Singh Gill-M/S Rajendra Singh Gill bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; Sh. Chaturbhuj Gupta-M/s Chaturbhuj Gupta won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.