Competitor profile

M/s Sejal Construction

They win 33% of what they bid — and 48% of the value, so the bids they miss are the smaller ones.

9tenders on record
3buyer authorities
1state
3 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
9
9 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
3
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 Cr
of ₹5.3 Cr bid — 48.3% conversion
Win rate
33.3%
of 9 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count9 bids
33.3%
66.7%
Awarded333.3%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected666.7%
Lost00.0%
By value₹5.3 Cr
48.3%
51.7%
Awarded₹2.5 Cr48.3%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.7 Cr51.7%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹2.5 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHUBHAM S. SANGNALE0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
VIJAYA CONSTRUCTION0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
Jagnnath Ganpati Kamble0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
TAMANNA NARAYAN RAMRAO0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
DATTA UDBUKE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
K K CONSTRUCTION1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹33.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSejal Construction awardedOthers

About M/s Sejal Construction

M/s Sejal Construction appears as a bidder on 9 government tenders on record, from 3 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 9 decided bids, it was awarded 3 — a 33.3% win rate — worth ₹2.5 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 3 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE Water Resources Department Aurangabad, at 65.2% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against SHUBHAM S. SANGNALE, VIJAYA CONSTRUCTION and Jagnnath Ganpati Kamble. SHUBHAM S. SANGNALE bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; M/s Sejal Construction won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.