Competitor profile

satyam furniture mart

They win 50% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
16 Apr 2024last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
1 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.5 L
of ₹5.5 L bid — 45.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost150.0%
By value₹5.5 L
45.0%
55.0%
Awarded₹2.5 L45.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹3.0 L55.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SAI TREDARS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹5.4 L
won head-to-head
02
₹0
won head-to-head
03
SHREE SHANKAR ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
04
HAFIZ JAMAL AND BROTHERS0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
05
₹0
won head-to-head
06
ANJANA TEXTILES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedsatyam furniture awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to satyam furniture

About satyam furniture mart

satyam furniture mart appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 16 Apr 2024.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Development Commissioner for Handlooms, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 113.9% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SAI TREDARS, SRI KALIKAMBA HANDLOOMS POWER LOOMS AND EQUIPMENTS AND ENGINEERING WORKS and SHREE SHANKAR ENTERPRISES. SAI TREDARS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; satyam furniture mart won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.