Competitor profile

ANJANA TEXTILES

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 2% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

2tenders on record
1buyer authority
0states
8 Dec 2023last award
Total bids
2
2 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
1
0 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.2 L
of ₹2.0 Cr bid — 2.1% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 2 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count2 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded150.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected150.0%
Lost00.0%
By value₹2.0 Cr
97.9%
Awarded₹4.2 L2.1%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹2.0 Cr97.9%
Lost₹00.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 0 states

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh

1 award on central/PSU portals carry no state

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
satyam furniture mart0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
₹0
won head-to-head
04
₹13,999
won head-to-head
05
SAI TREDARS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.9 L
won head-to-head
06
SHREE SHANKAR ENTERPRISES1 win · 1 shared tender
₹3.7 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedANJANA TEXTILES awardedOthers

Recent tenders awarded to ANJANA TEXTILES

About ANJANA TEXTILES

ANJANA TEXTILES appears as a bidder on 2 government tenders on record, from 1 buyer authority on central and PSU portals. Of its 2 decided bids, it was awarded 1 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹4.2 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 8 Dec 2023.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Development Commissioner for Handlooms, at 100.0% of what it has won. On priced bids, its median quote is 2928.4% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against satyam furniture mart, SAI HANDLOOM INDUSTRIES and JAASH ELECTRONIC CLUSTER PRIVATE LIMITED. satyam furniture mart bid on 1 of the same tender and won 0 of them; ANJANA TEXTILES won 0.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.