Competitor profile

SATYA BUILDERS

They win 37% of what they bid, and 37% of the value they chase.

19tenders on record
4buyer authorities
1state
4 Aug 2026last award
Total bids
19
19 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹69.9 L
of ₹1.9 Cr bid — 36.5% conversion
Win rate
36.8%
of 19 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count19 bids
36.8%
57.9%
Awarded736.8%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected15.3%
Lost1157.9%
By value₹1.9 Cr
36.5%
53.8%
Awarded₹69.9 L36.5%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹18.5 L9.7%
Lost₹1.0 Cr53.8%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

CE-PWD(B and R)₹58.4 L83.6%

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹69.9 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
SHRI RAM ENTERPRISES1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹4.7 L
won head-to-head
03
KOTLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹15.0 L
won head-to-head
04
ARVIND KUMAR BANSAL CONTRACTOR0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
VARDAAN CONSTRUCTIONS0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
BANSAL CONSTRUCTION COMPANY2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹10.6 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSATYA BUILDERS awardedOthers

About SATYA BUILDERS

SATYA BUILDERS appears as a bidder on 19 government tenders on record, from 4 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 19 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 36.8% win rate — worth ₹69.9 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 4 Aug 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is CE-PWD(B and R), at 83.6% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR, SHRI RAM ENTERPRISES and KOTLI CONSTRUCTION COMPANY. SHIV KUMAR CONTRACTOR bid on 3 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SATYA BUILDERS won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.