Competitor profile

Sarabjit Singh Matharu

They win 50% of what they bid, and 50% of the value they chase.

12tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
24 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
12
12 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
6 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹2.6 Cr
of ₹5.2 Cr bid — 49.9% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 12 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count12 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded650.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost650.0%
By value₹5.2 Cr
49.9%
50.1%
Awarded₹2.6 Cr49.9%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹2.6 Cr50.1%

Where they win

3 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Assam₹2.6 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
Arpon Jyoti Neog0 wins · 4 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
BORDOLOI AND SON ENTERPRISE1 win · 3 shared tenders
₹46.9 L
won head-to-head
03
Amritakshya Dutta0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Pranjyoti Neog1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹48.3 L
won head-to-head
05
NABAJIT KALITA1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹20.7 L
won head-to-head
06
Rajesh Dutta0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSarabjit Singh awardedOthers

About Sarabjit Singh Matharu

Sarabjit Singh Matharu appears as a bidder on 12 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 12 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹2.6 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 24 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Assam Agricultural University, at 54.9% of what it has won, out of 3 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Assam. On priced bids, its median quote is the lowest (L1).

It most often bids against Arpon Jyoti Neog, BORDOLOI AND SON ENTERPRISE and Amritakshya Dutta. Arpon Jyoti Neog bid on 4 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; Sarabjit Singh Matharu won 2.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.