Competitor profile

SANJEEV KUMAR SAW MILL

They win 50% of what they bid, but only 0% of the value — the bigger bids get away.

4tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
15 Feb 2025last award
Total bids
4
4 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
2 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹642
of ₹1.4 Cr bid — 0.0% conversion
Win rate
50.0%
of 4 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count4 bids
50.0%
50.0%
Awarded250.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost250.0%
By value₹1.4 Cr
100.0%
Awarded₹6420.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹1.4 Cr100.0%

Where they win

2 authorities · 1 state

Operating states

LowHigh
Punjab₹642

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
BANSAL AND SONS2 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹2.4 L
won head-to-head
02
JAI BHOLE TIMBER0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
03
KAILASH UDYOG0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
04
ASHOK TRADING CO1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹6
won head-to-head
05
RADHA KRISHAN ENTERPRISES0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
JUGALKISHOREAGGARWALSAWMILLS1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹44.8 L
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSANJEEV KUMAR awardedOthers

About SANJEEV KUMAR SAW MILL

SANJEEV KUMAR SAW MILL appears as a bidder on 4 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 4 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 50.0% win rate — worth ₹642 in total. Its most recent award on record is from 15 Feb 2025.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Department of Cooperation, at 99.1% of what it has won, out of 2 authorities that have awarded it work. Most of its awards come from Punjab. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.3% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against BANSAL AND SONS, JAI BHOLE TIMBER and KAILASH UDYOG. BANSAL AND SONS bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 2 of them; SANJEEV KUMAR SAW MILL won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.