Competitor profile

SAMMED KIRAN CHOUGULE

They win 14% of what they bid, and 6% of the value they chase.

44tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
18 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
44
44 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
6
35 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹37.5 L
of ₹6.6 Cr bid — 5.7% conversion
Win rate
13.6%
of 44 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count44 bids
13.6%
79.5%
Awarded613.6%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected36.8%
Lost3579.5%
By value₹6.6 Cr
13.3%
81.0%
Awarded₹37.5 L5.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹87.2 L13.3%
Lost₹5.3 Cr81.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹37.5 L

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
UDAYSING TANAJI THORAT0 wins · 34 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
02
AKSHAY RAMESH PATIL20 wins · 31 shared tenders
₹3.2 Cr
won head-to-head
03
Balaji Infrastructures3 wins · 11 shared tenders
₹48.4 L
won head-to-head
04
VIRAAT CONSTRUCTION2 wins · 10 shared tenders
₹53.8 L
won head-to-head
05
Indrajit Sanjay Ranmale Patil0 wins · 9 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
06
Shivendra Shankar Patil0 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSAMMED KIRAN awardedOthers

About SAMMED KIRAN CHOUGULE

SAMMED KIRAN CHOUGULE appears as a bidder on 44 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 44 decided bids, it was awarded 6 — a 13.6% win rate — worth ₹37.5 L in total. Its most recent award on record is from 18 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Directorate Of Municipal Administration, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.6% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against UDAYSING TANAJI THORAT, AKSHAY RAMESH PATIL and Balaji Infrastructures. UDAYSING TANAJI THORAT bid on 34 of the same tenders and won 0 of them; SAMMED KIRAN CHOUGULE won 6.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.