Competitor profile

Samay Padshi Construction

They win 28% of what they bid, and 22% of the value they chase.

26tenders on record
5buyer authorities
1state
13 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
25
26 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
7
11 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹4.8 Cr
of ₹22.2 Cr bid — 21.8% conversion
Win rate
28.0%
of 25 decided bids

Bid outcomes

How their decided bids ended, by number and by value
By count25 bids
28.0%
28.0%
44.0%
Awarded728.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected728.0%
Lost1144.0%
By value₹22.2 Cr
21.7%
58.8%
19.5%
Awarded₹4.8 Cr21.7%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹13.0 Cr58.8%
Lost₹4.3 Cr19.5%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Public Works Region₹4.8 Cr100.0%

Operating states

LowHigh
Maharashtra₹4.8 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
M/S. Shantaram Sahebrao Patil4 wins · 13 shared tenders
₹11.2 Cr
won head-to-head
02
Girija Construction6 wins · 7 shared tenders
₹1.4 Cr
won head-to-head
03
PAHUBA KRUPA CONSTRUCTION1 win · 4 shared tenders
₹58.3 L
won head-to-head
04
M/s. Kamlesh Patil0 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
05
Eng. Aadesh Shantaram Patil3 wins · 3 shared tenders
₹80.1 L
won head-to-head
06
Engg VRUSHABH VIJAY SHINDE0 wins · 2 shared tenders
₹0
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSamay Padshi awardedOthers

About Samay Padshi Construction

Samay Padshi Construction appears as a bidder on 26 government tenders on record, from 5 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 25 decided bids, it was awarded 7 — a 28.0% win rate — worth ₹4.8 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 13 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is Public Works Region, at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Maharashtra. On priced bids, its median quote is 1.0% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against M/S. Shantaram Sahebrao Patil, Girija Construction and PAHUBA KRUPA CONSTRUCTION. M/S. Shantaram Sahebrao Patil bid on 13 of the same tenders and won 4 of them; Samay Padshi Construction won 3.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.