Competitor profile

M/s. Salil Chopra

They win 40% of what they bid, and 45% of the value they chase.

5tenders on record
2buyer authorities
1state
11 Sept 2026last award
Total bids
5
5 including cancelled tenders
Awarded
2
3 lost · 0 still pending
Awarded value
₹9.7 Cr
of ₹21.5 Cr bid — 45.0% conversion
Win rate
40.0%
of 5 decided bids

Bid outcomes

Lost bids carry more value than won ones — they chase big and lose big
By count5 bids
40.0%
60.0%
Awarded240.0%
Pending00.0%
Tech rejected00.0%
Lost360.0%
By value₹21.5 Cr
45.0%
55.0%
Awarded₹9.7 Cr45.0%
Pending₹00.0%
Tech rejected₹00.0%
Lost₹11.8 Cr55.0%

Where they win

1 authority · 1 state

Top buyer organisations

Operating states

LowHigh
Uttar Pradesh₹9.7 Cr

Top competitors

In tenders they both bid · bar shows how the awards split
01
parvati and associates1 win · 2 shared tenders
₹7.0 Cr
won head-to-head
02
DGM WATER SMITHS CONSULTANCEY PVT LTD0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
03
M/S KAMAKHYA KIRTI ENTERPRISES0 wins · 1 shared tender
₹0
won head-to-head
04
Mahesh and Copany1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.3 Cr
won head-to-head
05
M/S SHRI KASHI CONTRACTORS1 win · 1 shared tender
₹2.4 Cr
won head-to-head
Rival awardedSalil Chopra awardedOthers

About M/s. Salil Chopra

M/s. Salil Chopra appears as a bidder on 5 government tenders on record, from 2 buyer authorities in 1 state. Of its 5 decided bids, it was awarded 2 — a 40.0% win rate — worth ₹9.7 Cr in total. Its most recent award on record is from 11 Sept 2026.

Its largest buyer by awarded value is U.P. Projects Corporation Ltd., at 100.0% of what it has won. Most of its awards come from Uttar Pradesh. On priced bids, its median quote is 0.2% above the lowest bid (L1).

It most often bids against parvati and associates, DGM WATER SMITHS CONSULTANCEY PVT LTD and M/S KAMAKHYA KIRTI ENTERPRISES. parvati and associates bid on 2 of the same tenders and won 1 of them; M/s. Salil Chopra won 1.

This profile is built from what portals disclose publicly. Several states never release bidder lists or quoted prices, so it likely understates a company's true footprint. Companies are matched by the name they bid under, so firms sharing a common name can appear together. A tender counts as won when the company received the award. TenderShark compiles these public records independently and has no association with any government portal, buyer, or bidder.